Smart, savvy, articulate and empowered women read and write romance books that reflect cultural shifts, and arguably contribute to cultural shifts. Some "feminists" argue that romances are harmful to the empowerment of our gender, while others say romance novels have helped women evolve. I guess it depends on how one defines feminism and feminist values. I assert that the heroine's happiness is pivotal to the modern romance novel and her needs - whatever they may be - are prioritised and supported and that this is a feminist ideal.
Image Courtesy of Pixabay.com |
I believe the huge popularity of the romance genre, written mostly by women for women, stems from the values in the novels resonating with female readership, being a fabulous platform for promoting open discussions about love and relationships and because they celebrate feminine power and success in a way that's very culturally relevant.
Romances focus on issues that are important to women. Our stories deal with all sorts of hard-hitting issues that modern women face - rape, abuse, loss of children... Name a problem and there'll be a romance book which features a heroine who's faced it. The message to female readers is that we're strong and capable of determining our own futures. We possess inner grit to endure and prevail over hardships.
Image courtesy of Pixabay.com |
Image Courtesy of Pixabay |
Heroines in modern romances are unapologetically sexual creatures who know how to communicate their needs and find a partner who can fulfil them. Social stigmas and traditional relationships are being overturned in place of new models of relationships including menage, BDSM, lesbian romance and more.
Image Courtesy of Pixabay |
Love to Love: Living in this time and embracing my feminism.
Love to Laugh: At the ridiculous, ill-informed commentary written by those who call romance novels "trashy".
Love to Learn: What do you think? Have romances impacted upon the empowerment of women, is it the other way around or is it a two-way process?
I truly love the empowerment romance novels give women. I've noted over the years there's been a shift from the 'hero saving the heroine' to the heroine saving herself, but supported by the hero or whatever. Yay. I get totally cranky at the way people who aren't familiar with romance dismiss it. One of the first people I heard who really laid it out was Jayne Ann Krentz, followed by Jennifer Crusie. Their comments made so much sense to me. Long live romance, and the heroines we want to be!
ReplyDeleteCouldn’t agree more, Malvina!
DeleteSo nicely put Alyssa. Thank you for an insightful post.
ReplyDeleteNothing you hadn’t concluded yourself, I’m sure, Cassandra, but a bit of a summary.
DeleteGreat post, Alyssa. Romance novels have come a long way, in keeping with the change in direction of women from 'dependent' to 'independent'.
ReplyDeleteI like that ‘dependent’ to ‘independent ‘ statement. How true that romance novels have evolved in that way!
DeleteAnother thought-provoking post, Alyssa. We are so lucky to be living in this time of independence for women, where we can be pretty much be whoever and whatever we want to be, and romance novels reflect that beautifully.
ReplyDeleteWe are fortunate! We’re so much more liberated than we were - at least in some parts of the world.
Delete