By Alyssa J. Montgomery
Romance writing 101 tells
us how important it is to create multi-dimensional characters and how our
readers want to be able to relate to the main characters—to admire the heroine,
feel as though they could be friends, or even want to be the heroine. In the
same way, our romance readers want to fall in love with our heroes.
Characterisation
and plot may go hand in hand, but for me if the characters aren’t tangible and
relatable, it doesn’t matter how good the plot is, I probably won’t finish the
book.
When
I’m asked to think back through the stories I’ve written and choose my
favourites, my standouts have been because I’ve formed a really close “bond”
with the characters rather than based on a favourite plotline or trope.
India,
for example, in The Formidable King,
was definitely not the character I had in mind for my hero. I was intrigued by
her and wanted to tell her story, but not in that particular book. But, she
kept forcing her way into my thoughts and insisting she was the right heroine
for my hero.
What made her so interesting to me was the very lifestyle she’d
led, the issues she’d had to deal with, the vulnerabilities she had and the strength
she possessed so that she could overcome those issues. She was so ‘real’ that
she ‘spoke’ to me. I was totally invested in her conflict, empathetic because I
understood her background and motivations, and I was rooting for her to achieve
her goals.
A summary of the most salient points I remember about characterisation from a stack of workshops I’ve attended and books that I’ve read emphasise that:
1. Impact can be made when the character engages in some
unexpected behaviour eg. the shy heroine letting loose at a karaoke evening or
having a little to drink and propositioning the hero
The strong, successful
heroine who becomes very submissive when she’s in the company of an elderly
aunt who’s raised her and perhaps has been critical of her
The
character has particularly strong beliefs about something but a shred of doubt
emerges that starts making them question their perspective
Characters must have flaws. Life is unpredictable
and complicated and the character who has a messy or conflicted life is easier
to relate to than the character who’s got life all sorted and has no need for
emotional growth.
Characters need to have
vulnerabilities.
The dimensions of characters
First
dimension is what you can see – physical appearance, quirks and habits, manner
of speech – whether this is a mask or real. Many supporting characters may be
one-dimensional.
Dig
a layer deeper and you have the character’s backstory – what has happened to
shape the character’s morals and reactions? Remember that a person is the sum
of all their fears, dreams and experiences. The backstory can tell us why the
character has unfulfilled desires, weaknesses, resentments, strengths and fears
or conflicts. It’s these things that we may be able to relate to ourselves or
that can make us more empathetic to them.
Then,
we need to have an understanding of the characters ethics/morals or beliefs
that lead to them to act a certain way.
Character
interviews are a useful way to get to know your characters well and to explore
the driving force of the story – their goal, motivation and conflict. (Enisa
Haines did a great article on this subject on the Breathless in the Bush Blog
in October, 2016.)
(Image : Courtesy of Pixabay.com)
Love to Love: My favourite characters are ones who have a good
moral compass but who may veer of path and do something out-of-character
because deep loyalty to a friend or family member and who are therefore
conflicted by that action.
Love to Learn: If you had to marry one romance book hero, who would you
choose? Likewise, if you could have one romance book heroine as your BFF, who
would you choose?
Love to Laugh: At situations where characters do something whacky
that is totally out of character.
